Richard Feynman smoked
- Browse by topicSearch our book database by subject, country, epoch, year of publication or key word.
- Book show of the weekHaven't you had time to read the newspaper or drop by us in the last few days? Doesn't matter, because here you can view our review notes from the last six days of publication sorted by newspaper or topic.
- Literature supplementsAll of our notes on the book reviews in the literature supplements from FAZ, FR, NZZ, SZ, taz and Zeit.
He was a brilliant physicist, cracked safes, found the cause of the Challenger disaster and loved playing bongo drums for a long time. John and Mary Gribbin tell the exemplary life of Nobel Prize winner Richard Feynman. From the American by Thorsten Schmidt.
Review note on Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, April 10, 2000
Hartmut Hänsel is not very enthusiastic about John and Mary Gribbin's biography of the famous physicist Richard Feynman. He criticizes the missing link between the admittedly abundant facts about Feynman's life and work and also criticizes the fact that only superficial insights are offered into the pioneering work of the physicist. The autobiographical anecdotes, which have already been published in two volumes, are much fresher and also convey an "authentic mood picture of the time" - which Hansel cannot attest to the gribbins. The biographers could "learn something" from Feynman when it comes to their own field of work.Read the review at buecher.de
Review note on Süddeutsche Zeitung, April 3, 2000
In her criticism, Susanne Wedlich traces very clearly - if perhaps not intentionally - how she fared while reading this biography. In the first chapters, the admiring tone of the authors gets on her nerves and the "uncritical" retelling of long-known episodes. Most of the characters in the book are "anemic". She is particularly offended by the portrayal of the wives. The authors characterize Feynman's second wife as a 'blonde sex bomb'. The next chapters, says Wedlich, describe the scientific work of Feynman, who received the Nobel Prize in 1965 for his research in quantum electrodynamics. "Hard fare", the reviewer notes, and presented "without didactic genius" on top of that. She breathes a sigh of relief when the authors turn back to the private sphere. And lo and behold - what got on her nerves before, she now likes: suddenly "the people gain in depth".Read the review at buecher.de
- Can President Donald Trump repeat his victory
- How rich are the members of Jehovah's Witnesses
- When did people start wearing diamonds?
- Is it important to go to church?
- Are Costco hot dogs kosher
- How did Michel Foucault die
- Why do people choose to be racist
- Can dogs eat burgers?
- Why do people form cities
- Should India attack Pakistan or not 1
- What was Nelson Mandela imprisoned for?
- How dangerous is barbed wire
- Why are Northern and Southern Ireland separated
- How do diesel trains work
- Can I get two PG diplomas?
- How does religious hierarchy work in Islam
- Can I eat Italian food with chopsticks?
- Arrange reluctant marriages
- Make hot women like ugly guys
- How to invest like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala
- What are your living hacks in Mumbai
- Nordic countries are the pure whites
- What is the classification of dialectical materialism
- What are some facts about Vir Sawarkar